Breaking News

IRS seeks membership nominations for the 2025 Internal Revenue Service Advisory Council

Peter J. Scalise

On Thursday, April 18th the Internal Revenue Service announced that it is now accepting applications for the 2025 Internal Revenue Service Advisory Council (hereinafter “IRSAC”) through May 31, 2024, including nominees for a newly created subcommittee focused on fairness issues. The IRSAC serves as an advisory body to the IRS commissioner...

MORE

Marital Dissolution Planning and Crowdfunding

Divorce Taxation

Sidney Kess, CPA, J.D., LL.M.

When couples split up, it’s still common for one party to make support payments to the other. Sometimes this continues until the death of the party receiving support; sometimes it...

MORE

The Bottom Line

Tax Strategies

Marital Dissolution Planning Post TCJA

Sidney Kess, CPA, J.D., LL.M.

The IRS reports that nearly 600,000 taxpayers claimed an alimony deduction on their 2015 returns (the most recent year for statistics) (https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/soi-a-inpd-id1703.pdf). The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017...

MORE

Feature Stories

Tax Court Upholds Strict Adherence to Requirements for IRS P…

Kathleen M. Lach

A recent decision issued by the U.S. Tax Court in Graev v. Commissioner 1 could prove pivotal in cases where a practitioner has requested abatement of penalties for their client...

MORE

Financial Planner

Understanding Pay Options with the new DOL Regulations

Jerry Love, CPA/PFS, CFP, CVA, ABV, CITP, CFF, CFFA

This article is a follow up to the prior article which highlights the new regulations for the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) from the Department of Labor (DOL) raising the...

MORE

Client Tax Tip

How Interest Can Be Deducted When Money is Borrowed to Buy I…

Julie Welch, CPA, CFP

If a taxpayer borrows money to purchase investments, such as mutual funds, bonds or stock, the interest paid on the loan can usually be deducted. There are two limitations, however...

MORE

Editor Blog

CPAs Wanting to Do It Themselves

Joshua Fluegel

In its ongoing effort to stay on the forefront of developments in tax profession technology, CPA Magazine talks to Mark Strassman, president of Make My Day CPA. Strassman discusses CPAs’...

MORE

Tax Checklist

Non-Grantor Trust Planning Tips Benefit Many Clients

Martin M. Shenkman, CPA, MBA, PFS, AEP, JD

Why You Must Understand the New Planning Benefits of Non-Grantor Trusts The 2017 Tax Act dramatically changed tax planning. In the new tax environment, there are a number of significant income...

MORE

Adamson Gary

Most firms are faced with the dilemma of keeping long-term managers who are major contributors to the firm but for whatever reason are not ready to be equity partners (or who perhaps never will have what it takes to be equity partners). In the past, most of us would not make the decision to outplace the long term managers since from many perspectives including client service, engagement and staff management, and profitability, they did a great job. But, there were missing pieces to making them an equity partner; we just weren’t willing to make an “up or out” decision although we were not willing to bring them into the partnership. So, we procrastinated until in many cases they left the firm.

We have also seen limits on the opportunity to make partner in many firms in the last few years due to the economy and slowing growth. We risk losing some of our stars because we can’t bring them in as quickly as we would like.

Both of these different issues have the same result: the loss of high level, talented people.  A relatively new approach to dealing with the problem is gaining popularity in medium to smaller sized firms. It is the no-equity partner position. Some firms call it a principal spot. For other firms there is a small piece of equity and they will call it a low equity partner spot. Regardless, the mission is to create an intermediate level between senior manager and partner. This type of partner position has been a common level on the ladder for the top 100 firms for several years.

Here is an outline of what the position looks like, how it differs from the normal equity partner spot and some considerations to implement it in your firm.

First, the difference between no-equity and equity should be internal only. From the perspective of the public and clients, this is a partner position. Making a new no-equity partner is a big deal and you should celebrate it inside and especially outside the firm, just as you would a new equity partner. These individuals wear the partner title.

In most firms, the no-equity partners function just like the equity partners in terms of serving clients. They probably have been serving this rolealready as senior managers. The differences are typically in how you pay them and whether they receive other partner benefits like buyout and retirement.

Most firms utilize a different compensation plan for the no-equity partners. They may participate in firm profits to some extent but they are typically not in the equity partner compensation plan or year-end pool. It is common to see a base salary that is between a senior manager and an equity partner with a bonus potential based on some percentage of that salary or a profit pool separate from the equity partners. 

The no-equity partners make either a very small equity contribution or none at all and they do not participate in the firm’s equity partner goodwill buyout or deferred comp plan. They do participate in the firm’s qualified pension plan and in most cases their other fringe benefits are the same as the benefits provided to equity partners.

From the perspective of firm governance, the no-equity partners should participate in partner meetings including firm retreats. Normally they will not be eligible for service on the firm’s executive board or management committee. They will be able to vote their shares if they hold any.

Many firms use the no-equity partner position as a preliminary step to admitting someone as an equity partner. In other words, the no-equity partner will spend some time at the no-equity level while developing their book of business or fulfilling whatever additional requirements are necessary. Most of the time firms will permit someone to remain indefinitely at the no-equity level. I encourage you to establish and communicate the criteria for moving to the equity level as a part of your firm’s career development program. The expectations should be clear.

You may also be witnessing the phenomena in your firm where at least one or two generations of your people don’t want the same things that we (the older folks) wanted. Their motivations may be different and they just might be happy (happier) with something less than the full equity role that most of us chased. Maybe title and some recognition/differentiation along with minor financial changes are the perfect combination for them.  

The no-equity partner position in your firm may be the answer to keeping talented people while helping the firm maintain the right leverage and number of equity owners.

Gary Adamson has extensive hands-on experience as the recent managing partner of a top 200 CPA firm. He can be reached at 765-488-0691 or www.adamsonadvisory.com/blog.

Comments powered by CComment