Breaking News

Treasury Secretary Yellen Addresses Global Minimum Tax Treatment of the U.S. Federal-Level R&D Tax Credit Program

Peter J. Scalise

On March 21st, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen indicated that she was optimistic that the U.S. would be able to maintain the value of its Federal-Level R&D Tax Credit Program that was originally introduced into the U.S. Internal Revenue Code under President Reagan’s Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 for companies...

MORE

Marital Dissolution Planning and Crowdfunding

Divorce Taxation

Sidney Kess, CPA, J.D., LL.M.

When couples split up, it’s still common for one party to make support payments to the other. Sometimes this continues until the death of the party receiving support; sometimes it...

MORE

The Bottom Line

Tax Strategies

Marital Dissolution Planning Post TCJA

Sidney Kess, CPA, J.D., LL.M.

The IRS reports that nearly 600,000 taxpayers claimed an alimony deduction on their 2015 returns (the most recent year for statistics) (https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/soi-a-inpd-id1703.pdf). The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017...

MORE

Feature Stories

Tax Court Upholds Strict Adherence to Requirements for IRS P…

Kathleen M. Lach

A recent decision issued by the U.S. Tax Court in Graev v. Commissioner 1 could prove pivotal in cases where a practitioner has requested abatement of penalties for their client...

MORE

Financial Planner

Understanding Pay Options with the new DOL Regulations

Jerry Love, CPA/PFS, CFP, CVA, ABV, CITP, CFF, CFFA

This article is a follow up to the prior article which highlights the new regulations for the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) from the Department of Labor (DOL) raising the...

MORE

Client Tax Tip

How Interest Can Be Deducted When Money is Borrowed to Buy I…

Julie Welch, CPA, CFP

If a taxpayer borrows money to purchase investments, such as mutual funds, bonds or stock, the interest paid on the loan can usually be deducted. There are two limitations, however...

MORE

Editor Blog

CPAs Wanting to Do It Themselves

Joshua Fluegel

In its ongoing effort to stay on the forefront of developments in tax profession technology, CPA Magazine talks to Mark Strassman, president of Make My Day CPA. Strassman discusses CPAs’...

MORE

Tax Checklist

Non-Grantor Trust Planning Tips Benefit Many Clients

Martin M. Shenkman, CPA, MBA, PFS, AEP, JD

Why You Must Understand the New Planning Benefits of Non-Grantor Trusts The 2017 Tax Act dramatically changed tax planning. In the new tax environment, there are a number of significant income...

MORE

McKenzie RobertEach year the IRS assesses over 40 million penalties against taxpayers. Of the total number of assessed penalties over 5 million of them are eventually abated by the Service. Generally the IRS only abates penalties when the taxpayer contests the penalty. Since most taxpayers don’t contest IRS penalties the number of abated penalties is artificially low. Most taxpayers and their representatives are unaware that if the taxpayer establishes a reasonable cause for failure to comply with tax laws, the applicable penalties may be abated. Therefore sophisticated taxpayers and their representatives have a much greater chance of reducing tax penalties than the approximately 12% abatement rate for all penalties. It is in a taxpayer’s best interest to contest IRS penalties if she has a reasonable cause for her noncompliance.

[This article is course content for the Tax Season 2016 CPE quiz, worth 3 CPE credits! Reach the quiz and additional content HERE.]

Chapter 20 of the Internal Revenue Manual provides guidance to IRS employees on the standards for reasonable cause. Reasonable cause is based on all the facts and circumstances in each situation and allows the IRS to provide relief from a penalty that would otherwise be assessed. Reasonable cause relief is generally granted when the taxpayer exercised ordinary business care and prudence in determining their tax obligations but nevertheless failed to comply with those obligations. Reasonable causes is defined by the Internal Revenue Manual in the following manner:

“Any reason that establishes a taxpayer exercised ordinary business care and prudence but nevertheless failed to comply with the tax law may be considered for penalty relief.” The most important part of that definition is the term ordinary business care and prudence. Ordinary business care and prudence is defined as follows in the Internal Revenue Manual:

“Ordinary business care and prudence includes making provisions for business obligations to be met when reasonably foreseeable events occur. A taxpayer may establish reasonable cause by providing facts and circumstances showing that they exercised ordinary business care and prudence (taking that degree of care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise), but nevertheless were unable to comply with the law.”

The Internal Revenue Manual sets forth a series of circumstances that would allow a taxpayer to establish reasonable cause and secure abatement of tax penalties. The following is a partial list of excuses that might establish reasonable cause:

• Death, Serious Illness, or Unavoidable Absence

• Fire, Casualty, Natural Disaster, or Other Disturbance

• Unable to Obtain Records

• Mistake was Made

• Erroneous Advice or Reliance

• Ignorance of the Law

• Forgetfulness

• Statutory Exceptions or Waivers

• Undue Hardship

• Written Advice From IRS

• Oral Advice From IRS

• Advice from A Tax Advisor

• Official Disaster Area

• Service Error

Practitioners may be surprised to learn that the IRS uses a computer program to review abatement request. The program is known as Reasonable Cause Assistant (RCA). Therefore it is in the best interest of the taxpayer for his representative to submit a letter specifically requesting abatement of penalties which quotes the Internal Revenue Manual with respect to reasonable cause and cites to specific reasons set forth in the manual. The greater the specificity of the reasonable cause letter, the greater the chance that the IRS may abate that penalty.

The RCA provides that taxpayers who have not been penalized by the IRS in the past may have their penalties reduced. The IRS Manual sets forth a First Time Abatement Rule. That rule generally allows IRS employees to abate penalties asserted against formerly compliant taxpayers. The manual provides as follows:

“RCA provides an option for penalty relief for the Failure To File, Fade To Pay, and/or Failure To Deposit Penalties if the taxpayer has not previously been required to file a return or if no prior penalties (except the Estimated Tax Penalty, on the same taxpayer…in the prior 3 years.”

Robert E. McKenzie of the law firm of Arnstein & Lehr LLP of Chicago, Illinois, concentrates his practice in representation before the Internal Revenue Service and state tax agencies. He previously served as a member of the IRS Advisory Council (IRSAC) which is a group appointed by the IRS Commissioner from 2009 to 2011.

Comments powered by CComment